By Rizwan Ahmad
In Karan Johar’s 2010 Bollywood film My name is Khan, the main protagonist Rizwan Khan (played by Shah Rukh Khan) a young man suffering from Asperger syndrome, insists that the correct pronunciation of his last name is ‘Khan’, produced from the epiglottis.
The Urdu sound in kh_an is the same as the one in kh_vab, ‘dream’, produced in the throat, which is different from the sound [kh], for example in khel (sports).
Gulzar, the acclaimed poet, made a comment in The Frontline about the decline of Urdu sounds. He mentioned how the Urdu sound /kh_/ when mispronounced in the word dawakh_ana(pharmacy) as dawakhana, means something different, ‘to take medicine’.
The sound /kh_/ in the name ‘Khan’ is one of the five sounds, namely /f/, /z/, /kh_/, /gh_/, and /q/ that distinguish Urdu from Hindi at the spoken level.
They occur in Urdu words such as fareb (deceit), zulm, (oppression), kh_andan (family), gh_alat (wrong), and qismat(destiny).
You can hear the sound [kh_] enunciated as per Urdu phonetic norms by LataMangeshkar, whose mother tongue is Marathi, in her song ‘Kh_udanigahbanhotumhara’ from the film Mughal-e-Azam.
Popular: My mother was almost cast as Anarkali for Mughal-e-Azam. At home, she was violently abused by her husband
We can understand the significance of the Urdu pronunciation from the story NasreenMunniKabir narrates in her book on LataMangeshkar.
Lata, being a Marathi speaker, was initially unable to pronounce these sounds correctly. However, she realised how critical they were and became determined to learn Urdu.
She reminisces that after finishing recording for the 1949 film Mahal, Jaddanbai, Nargis’ mother, herself a celebrated singer, complimented Lata and said that she pronounced the Urdu word baghair (without) correctly in the song ‘Aayegaaanewaala’.
Asha Bhonsle, another great singer who charmed many generations with her captivating voice, too laments the decline of Urdu sounds in Hindi songs and notes, “Today’s singers don’t know Hindi. As far as their knowledge of Urdu is concerned, let’s not talk about it at all”.
It was not the singers alone who took the Urdu diction seriously. Music directors made sure that the songs they produced met the standards.
Naushad, the maestro, in a tribute to Lata on her 70th birthday mentioned: “In fact, Mehboobsaab would tell me that she is a Marathi girl, her pronunciations are not right, and I was making her sing a ghazal. I took the responsibility of making her perfect her pronunciation”.
Manna Dey, a native speaker of Bengali, in which these sounds do not exist, once noted that C. Ramchandra taught him how important pronunciation was and that he would not allow any word to be mispronounced.
In my research paper “My name is Khan… from the epiglottis: Changing linguistic norms in Bollywood songs” published in the Journal of South Asian Popular Culture, I examine the erosion of the pronunciation of the Urdu sounds /kh_/, /gh_/, and /q/ across decades starting from the 1960s to the 2010s.
I did this by creating a corpus of songs that won the Filmfare awards. The corpus consisted of 226 songs from Yahudi (1958) to Talash(2014), which were sung by a total of 44 singers from different linguistic backgrounds.
I studied the lyrics from the perspective of whether the sounds /kh_/, /gh_/, and /q/ were pronounced like Urdu, or were they merged with the sounds /kh/, /g/, and /k/.
My research shows that until the end of 1980s, they were performed by singers, regardless of their religious or linguistic backgrounds, according to the Urdu phonetic norms.
The only exception was when the song was written in a dialect of Hindi for a folk character in which case they were pronounced according to Hindi norms.
An example of this is the song Nain lad jaihen to manwan man kasakhoibekari from the 1961 film Ganga Jumna in which Mohammad Rafi sang for the rustic and uneducated character Ganga.
In this song, the Urdu sounds /z/ and /gh_/ in words rozgaar(job) and gh_azal were pronounced as rojgaarandgajal.
With the advent of the 1990s, the linguistic norms that Bollywood cherished and enforced for decades began to transform. The songs produced from the 1990s do not show the same standards of pronunciation.
Singers such as Shreya Ghoshal perform them according to Hindi norms. In the 2012 film Barfi, she pronounces the /kh_/ in the Urdu words shaakh_en (branches) and kh_archaa (expense) as /kh/, as per Hindi phonetic norms.
Similarly, Ghoshal and Shankar Mahadevan perform the sound /kh_/ in the refrain Noor-e kh_uda and kh_vabon (dreams) as per the Hindi phonetic norms in the film My Name is Khan.
Other examples include Kumar Sanu and AlkaYagnik in the song Kisi se tum pyaarkaro, in which they perform the Urdu sounds /q/ and /kh_/ in words iqrar (confess), kh_ushi (happiness) and ashiqon(lovers) as per Hindi norms.
The words iqrar, kh_ushi, and ashiqon, sound as ikrar, khushi, and ashikon.
Although the paper does not delve into all the factors responsible for this linguistic erosion in Hindi songs, it does discuss some.
First, the decline of Urdu sounds began in the 1990s, which marks the rise of the Hindutva politics and the beginning of the mushrooming of cable television networks.
Urdu, which was still highly valued in the 1990s, became isolated from the mainstream.
Second, the erosion could also be reflective of the decline of the Urdu language in India in general.
A third possible factor is the gradual disappearance of the old generation of writers, lyricists, playwrights and music directors, regardless of their religious identities, who were educated in the Urdu language and culture and the appearance of a new generation educated in the Hindi and English linguistic traditions.
They do not have access to the linguistic resources of Urdu and therefore their language shows the norms associated with a mixed-language containing elements of Hindi and English to the exclusion of Urdu.
The multiple factors responsible for the change may be debatable. However, what is not debatable is the fact that the shibboleth of the Bollywood diction, at whose core was Urdu, is slowly withering away.
